The intersection of power, leadership, and multicultural inclusion into such a flexible dynamic is intriguing, not because it is generally overlooked by those in power who prefer to label multiculturalism as Minority, but because it may be the first time I have seen it considered seriously on such a scale. This puts some power into the hands of those most negatively affected by policy and allows them to take part in effecting change. In particular the APA multicultural guidelines call for activism by psychologists to effect change and achieve equality for all peoples affected by treatment of the so-called majority in various settings. Since I view objectivity, except in exceptional cases, generally impossible, it is refreshing to see activism and change agents at the professional level.
At the heart of the APA Multicultural guidelines is acknowledgement that the ethnic and cultural makeups of the United States population are changing and have been changing for several years. Living in Texas and California for a time, I realized that the so-called white majority was no longer a majority in either state. This was acknowledged by the census a few years ago, but while I was living in Texas, a local community radio station that was supposed to reflect the diversity of Austin did not and fought to keep control of the station and the board even while professing to be diverse and liberal. An attempt to create a diversity committee was not successful. In hindsight, I wonder if some aspects of community psychology would be beneficial?