Rappaport (1998) reinforces a previous written critique I had in another course. Researchers in community psychology as well as humanistic psychology are not there for themselves or to dictate a narrative, whether it is finding a means to evolve through a series of community problems or not. Rappaport explains it as being, “useful to people who have limited access to resources” where researchers serve as amplifiers to those voices. While I have thought about this at length, I hadn’t considered it as a subject of academic research. I have considered it as something that is necessary to do within the context of research to help people help themselves and empower them as individuals and groups in their own communities.
You are currently browsing articles tagged social change.
#BlackLivesMatter ABCD advertising propaganda anarchism asset based community development community community activism community building community development community organizing community psychology consciousness creativity farmers markets feminism food stability food sustainability gender propaganda homesteading humanisitic psychology humanistic psychology individual revolution inequality institutional racism intentional communities intentional propaganda intersectional feminism language as propaganda language as sexism language of sexism media propaganda mythology Participatory Action Research permaculture propaganda propaganda as sexism psychology quantitative methods quantitative research racism sexism sexist propaganda sustainability unintentional propaganda vegan